cpufreq: preserve freq_table_sorted across suspend/hibernate
During S3/S4 suspend and resume, cpufreq policies are not freed or recreated; the freq_table and policy structure remain intact. However, set_freq_table_sorted() currently resets policy->freq_table_sorted to UNSORTED unconditionally, which is unnecessary since the table order does not change across suspend/resume. This patch adds a check to skip validation if policy->freq_table_sorted is already ASCENDING or DESCENDING. This avoids unnecessary traversal of the frequency table on S3/S4 resume or repeated online events, reducing overhead while preserving correctness. Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251011072420.11495-1-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
673e75ea55
commit
6db0f533d3
|
|
@ -1421,9 +1421,12 @@ static int cpufreq_policy_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|||
* If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it
|
||||
* offline and drop it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(policy);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_offline_policy;
|
||||
if (policy->freq_table_sorted != CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING &&
|
||||
policy->freq_table_sorted != CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING) {
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(policy);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_offline_policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
|
||||
cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue